The Scottish Information Commissioner received a number of similar applications for a decision from MacRoberts, Solicitors. These applications concerned requests for copies of the lists of properties in respect of which councils collect (and in some cases do not collect) the waste water charges and household water charges on behalf of Scottish Water. An explanation of the Commissioner’s reasoning in the following decision letter is set out in some detail in decision 056/2006 (MacRoberts and the City of Edinburgh Council): http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/appealsdecisions/decisions/Documents/decision6056.htm.
Decision 122/2006 MacRoberts and North Ayrshire Council
Requests for copies of the lists of properties in respect of which North Ayrshire Council does not collect the waste water charges and household water charges on behalf of Scottish Water – whether disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice substantially the commercial interests of any person under section 33(1)(b) – whether the information is otherwise accessible under section 25 of the Act – the Commissioner held that the information is exempt in terms of section 33(1)(b) of the Act
Lists of properties in respect of which North Ayrshire Council does not collect the waste water charges and household water charges on behalf of Scottish Water
Our Ref:
200501806
Mr David Flint
MacRoberts Solicitors
23 June 2006
Dear Mr Flint
DECISION NOTICE – SECTION 49 OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002
DECISION NUMBER 122/2006
PUBLIC AUTHORITY: NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL (THE COUNCIL)
I refer to the application you made to me on 13 May 2005 for a decision as to whether the Council dealt with the information requests you made in accordance with Part 1 of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA). In this case, the information requested consisted of copies of the lists of properties in respect of which the Council does not collect the waste water charges and household water charges on behalf of Scottish Water.
Please note that this is a formal decision notice under section 49 of FOISA.
I have now completed my investigation. In doing so, any points raised in your applications and any comments submitted to me by the Council have been taken into account.
Background
The Council refused your requests on the basis of the following sections in FOISA: section 25 (information otherwise accessible) and section 33(1)(b) (disclosure under FOISA would, or would be likely to, prejudice substantially the commercial interests of any person, including, without prejudice to that generality, a Scottish public authority).
Decision
After carrying out an investigation, I am satisfied that the Council was correct not to provide you with the information you requested as the information withheld from you is exempt from disclosure under section 33(1)(b) on the grounds that disclosure of the information under FOISA would, or would be likely to, prejudice substantially the commercial interests of Scottish Water. I also found that that it would not be in the public interest to release such information on the grounds that the loss of income which is currently obtained by Scottish Water in providing property search certificates under the provisions of its publication scheme and in entering into licensed arrangements with commercial organisations in respect of property searches would, or would be likely to, have the unintended consequence of increasing overall water
and sewerage charges which would not be in the interest of the public.
I have however found that the Council was wrong to rely upon the exemption under section 25 of FOISA, since lists of properties in respect of which the Council does not collect waste water charges and household water charges on behalf of Scottish Water are not contained within Scottish Water’s publication scheme. The information requested is therefore not otherwise accessible in terms of being reasonably obtainable under Scottish Water’s publication scheme.
As you are aware, this particular application is very similar to another application by MacRoberts which I considered in detail in decision 056/2006, MacRoberts and the City of Edinburgh Council. That decision was sent to you by recorded delivery on 28 March 2006 and I understand that you have confirmed that you have received that decision. Whilst I am not specifically required by FOISA to provide reasons for my decisions, I wish to make it clear that the reasons for coming to this particular decision are set out in some detail in decision 056/2006, therefore I refer you to that decision for an explanation of my reasoning in this particular case.
Appeal
Should either MacRoberts or the Council wish to appeal against this decision, there is a right of appeal to the Court of Session on a point of law only. Any such appeal must be made within 42 days of receipt of this notice.
I have sent a copy of this decision to the Council. This decision notice will be made available on my website in due course.
Yours sincerely
Kevin Dunion
Scottish Information Commissioner
Link to PDF file of decision 122/2006 (18.3 kb)